Study & Revision

Security Assessment & Penetration Testing

Security Assessment & Penetration Testing

CompTIA Security+CREST CPSA

Taught in the Study Guide:

These lessons cover more than the currently available revision; consult the scope below for each concept.

Evidence labels show where each concept’s recorded learning comes from: classroom sessions, Study Buddy sessions, supplementary Study Guide explanations or a mix. Reviewed revision may go further, so you can study ahead. Available questions do not imply complete topic or exam coverage.

Official syllabus references

CompTIA Security+

Exam version SY0-701 · All 28 numbered objectives represented; detailed bullets and revision content remain partial.

  • 5.5 · Audits and assessments

Related groups: 4.0 · Security operations; 5.0 · Security programme management and oversight. Topic organisation is editorial; consult the official specification for full detail.

CREST CPSA

Specification 2.5 · All official groups represented; only selected verified skill IDs are catalogued. Detailed skills and revision content remain partial.

  • A1 · Engagement lifecycle

Related groups: A · Soft skills and assessment management. Topic organisation is editorial; consult the official specification for full detail.

Assurance and the Limits of Penetration Testing

Evidence: Mixed

Revision: Available · 4 questions · 1 flashcard

Exam relevance

Learning-only · no verified exam mapping

    Reviewed revision scope

    • Classroom (Session 2): a penetration test is performed within a defined scope and timeframe, cannot guarantee that every vulnerability is found, and an attacker may have considerably more time than the tester.
    • Classroom (Session 2): penetration testing is one component of an ongoing security programme, not a one-time guarantee that an organisation cannot be compromised.
    • Classroom (Session 4): certification and a continuously staffed SOC provide assurance and capability but cannot guarantee that every attack is prevented.
    • Supplementary: self-assessment, independent technical verification, certification audit, penetration testing and monitoring each show something narrower than overall security, and systems change and new vulnerabilities emerge after a test.
    Outside the authored revision scope
    • Penetration-testing methodology and techniques
    • Practical penetration-testing experience
    • Unverified exam objectives

    Recorded evidence

    • Classroom (Session 2): a penetration test is performed within a defined scope and timeframe, cannot guarantee that every vulnerability is found, and an attacker may have considerably more time than the tester.
    • Classroom (Session 2): penetration testing is one component of an ongoing security programme, not a one-time guarantee that an organisation cannot be compromised.
    • Classroom (Session 4): certification and a continuously staffed SOC provide assurance and capability but cannot guarantee that every attack is prevented.
    • Supplementary: self-assessment, independent technical verification, certification audit, penetration testing and monitoring each show something narrower than overall security, and systems change and new vulnerabilities emerge after a test.
    • Session 2: Cyber Fundamentals Part 2 — Classroom session record · The CIA Triad; The DAD Triad; Securing Devices; Denial; DDoS Mitigation; Security, Usability and Functionality; Policies, Standards, Procedures and Guidelines
    • Session 4: Governance, Risk and Compliance — In Depth — Classroom session record · The Three GRC Pillars; Compliance ≠ Security; ISO/IEC 27001 and Continual Improvement; Why Consultants Need Business Context; Business Impact Analysis; Assessing Risk; Identifying and Managing Risk; Frameworks and Standards; UK GDPR and Data Protection; Data Classification and Handling
    • Assurance and the Limits of Penetration Testing — Supplementary Study Guide explanation · Assurance answers a specific question; What a penetration test is; Why a breach can follow a clean test; Thinking like an attacker; Using assurance well
    Not established by the recorded evidence
    • Penetration-testing methodology and techniques
    • Practical penetration-testing experience
    • Unverified exam objectives

    Reviewed 2026-09-24. Reviewed against the linked Learning Log entries and Study Guide lesson Sources and scope sections. Scope statements are labelled Classroom, Study Buddy or Supplementary. No practical competence, completed assessment or exam alignment is implied.

    Full penetration-testing methodology

    Evidence: Not yet recorded

    Revision material not yet added · 0 questions · 0 flashcards

    Exam relevance

    CREST CPSA
    • CPSA · A1 · direct

      This concept relates to the cited objective. Course coverage and authored revision do not establish full objective coverage.

    Verified for CPSA: 0 of 0 questions and 0 of 0 flashcards. The mapping does not verify the others.

    Reviewed revision scope

    Revision scope has not yet been authored and reviewed.

      Outside the authored revision scope
      • Full penetration-testing methodology

      Recorded evidence

      Not yet recorded in classroom, Study Buddy or Study Guide learning. This does not prevent revision.

        Not established by the recorded evidence
        • Full penetration-testing methodology

        Reviewed 2026-09-16. Reviewed against the linked repository learning record. Scope is introductory; no practical competence or complete objective coverage is implied.

        Testing authorisation

        Evidence: Classroom-supported

        Revision: Available · 2 questions · 1 flashcard

        Exam relevance

        CREST CPSA
        • CPSA · A2 · supporting

          Written permission is supporting context; detailed law and compliance are not evidenced.

        Verified for CPSA: 0 of 2 questions and 0 of 1 flashcard. The mapping does not verify the others.

        Reviewed revision scope

        • Obtain written permission before security testing.
        • Authorisation defines what is allowed.
        Outside the authored revision scope
        • Full penetration-testing methodology
        • Legal interpretation
        • Exploitation techniques

        Recorded evidence

        • Obtain written permission before security testing.
        • Authorisation defines what is allowed.
        • Session 1: Cyber Fundamentals Part 1 — Classroom session record · Key Takeaways; Attack Chain; Threat Actors; Risky User Behaviour; Thinking Like an Attacker; Practical Relevance
        Not established by the recorded evidence
        • Full penetration-testing methodology
        • Legal interpretation
        • Exploitation techniques

        Reviewed 2026-09-16. Reviewed against the linked repository learning record. Scope is introductory; no practical competence or complete objective coverage is implied.

        Testing Scope, Discovery and Disclosure

        Evidence: Mixed

        Revision: Available · 5 questions · 1 flashcard

        Exam relevance

        Learning-only · no verified exam mapping

          Reviewed revision scope

          • Classroom (Session 1): permission and the purpose of an activity distinguish legitimate security testing from criminal activity.
          • Classroom (Session 2): discovering a weakness, as in the bank-door analogy, does not give permission to exploit it.
          • Supplementary: an authorised test is limited to its agreed scope of systems, times and techniques, and anything outside that scope is unauthorised.
          • Supplementary: responsible disclosure reports a weakness privately to the organisation that can fix it and allows time for a fix before details are published.
          • Supplementary: in the UK, the Computer Misuse Act 1990 makes unauthorised access to computer material an offence; permission from someone entitled to give it separates authorised testing from an offence.
          Outside the authored revision scope
          • Full penetration-testing methodology
          • Exploitation techniques
          • Legal advice or interpretation of specific cases
          • Practical security-testing experience
          • Unverified exam objectives

          Recorded evidence

          • Classroom (Session 1): permission and the purpose of an activity distinguish legitimate security testing from criminal activity.
          • Classroom (Session 2): discovering a weakness, as in the bank-door analogy, does not give permission to exploit it.
          • Supplementary: an authorised test is limited to its agreed scope of systems, times and techniques, and anything outside that scope is unauthorised.
          • Supplementary: responsible disclosure reports a weakness privately to the organisation that can fix it and allows time for a fix before details are published.
          • Supplementary: in the UK, the Computer Misuse Act 1990 makes unauthorised access to computer material an offence; permission from someone entitled to give it separates authorised testing from an offence.
          • Session 1: Cyber Fundamentals Part 1 — Classroom session record · Key Takeaways; Attack Chain; Threat Actors; Risky User Behaviour; Thinking Like an Attacker; Practical Relevance
          • Session 2: Cyber Fundamentals Part 2 — Classroom session record · The CIA Triad; The DAD Triad; Securing Devices; Denial; DDoS Mitigation; Security, Usability and Functionality; Policies, Standards, Procedures and Guidelines
          • Ethics, Authorisation and Responsible Disclosure — Supplementary Study Guide explanation · Permission and scope; Discovering is not permission to exploit; Responsible disclosure; Reporting concerns inside an organisation; Legal and professional considerations
          Not established by the recorded evidence
          • Full penetration-testing methodology
          • Exploitation techniques
          • Legal advice or interpretation of specific cases
          • Practical security-testing experience
          • Unverified exam objectives

          Reviewed 2026-09-24. Reviewed against the linked Learning Log entries and Study Guide lesson Sources and scope sections. Scope statements are labelled Classroom, Study Buddy or Supplementary. No practical competence, completed assessment or exam alignment is implied.